Support > About independent server > Is the Los Angeles data center of the US server suitable for video websites?
Is the Los Angeles data center of the US server suitable for video websites?
Time : 2025-10-16 15:25:46
Edit : Jtti

  Among the many overseas server options, Los Angeles data centers have always been one of the most popular locations for Chinese webmasters and businesses building video websites. Los Angeles is not only the most important internet transit city on the US West Coast, but also a major network hub between Asia and North America. For video websites primarily targeting users in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia, choosing a Los Angeles data center offers inherent advantages in bandwidth, latency, international connectivity, and content delivery. However, it also presents some hidden challenges and barriers to entry. If you're considering hosting your video website in a Los Angeles data center, it's crucial to understand its network architecture, performance characteristics, and applicable scenarios.

  As a major data center hub in the United States, Los Angeles boasts extensive internet infrastructure and comprehensive international connectivity resources. Nearly all major carriers have deployed backbone nodes in Los Angeles, including top global network providers like NTT, Telia, Level3, Cogent, HE, GTT, and Lumen. Furthermore, Los Angeles is a landing point for submarine fiber optic cables heading to Asia, with dense international links directly connecting to Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and other regions. For video websites, these geographical and network advantages mean shorter transmission paths, lower latency, and more stable trans-Pacific access speeds.

  In terms of access performance, the average latency for domestic users accessing data centers in Los Angeles typically ranges from 140 to 200ms. Using CN2 GIA, CTGNET, or optimized BGP connections, latency can be reduced to around 110ms, with some China Telecom and China Unicom nodes even maintaining latency around 90ms. For video playback, this latency is more than sufficient to support high-definition video streaming. In contrast, data centers in the Eastern US or Europe often experience latency exceeding 250ms, which can easily lead to video stuttering, slow buffering, and playback delays. Therefore, Los Angeles has become the preferred location for domestic and international video websites to deploy in the US.

  In addition to distance and connectivity, bandwidth resources are a key consideration for video websites. Los Angeles data centers offer ample bandwidth, with most data centers offering international bandwidth starting at 100Mbps, and some even supporting inbound speeds exceeding 10Gbps. For HD video distribution, this high-bandwidth environment significantly improves the user experience and reduces the likelihood of lag. Compared to Asian nodes, Los Angeles offers lower bandwidth prices and a better value for money. For example, with comparable bandwidth, the monthly rental cost of a data center in Japan or Hong Kong is often more than double that of one in Los Angeles, yet the latter offers comparable transmission stability. For this reason, many video websites choose to locate their primary origin in Los Angeles and then utilize CDNs to accelerate distribution across Asia, balancing cost and performance.

  However, the workload characteristics of video services also place higher demands on servers. Video content primarily relies on high traffic and high concurrency, making storage and I/O performance crucial. If choosing a Los Angeles data center to build a video platform, it's recommended to prioritize servers with SSD or NVMe storage, ensuring sufficient CPU cores and memory to support operations such as transcoding, distribution, and caching. Furthermore, some carriers offer lines or models optimized for streaming. These solutions typically include anti-attack and anti-CC policies, as well as stable export priorities, effectively ensuring playback continuity.

  In practice, video websites often face cross-regional access challenges. For example, users in mainland China frequently watch, Southeast Asia access, and Japan simultaneously load. If all traffic is routed directly back to the Los Angeles data center, this can cause bandwidth pressure and back-origin bottlenecks. Therefore, the best practice is to use a Los Angeles server as the "primary origin" and distribute cached content using global CDN nodes (particularly in Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, and Taiwan). This not only reduces access latency but also significantly reduces the bandwidth load on the data center.

  In terms of stability, Los Angeles data centers offer excellent stability. Most large data centers are equipped with dual power supplies, automatic switchover backup systems, and multiple firewalls and DDoS protections. For video sites, this redundant architecture ensures stable operation even during peak traffic surges. Furthermore, due to Los Angeles' mature network infrastructure, data centers typically offer extremely high SLA availability (over 99.99%), with downtime rates far lower than some small and medium-sized data centers in Asia.

  However, not all Los Angeles servers are suitable for video sites. While some low-cost VPSs or budget-friendly dedicated servers offer affordable rentals, they often suffer from poor bandwidth quality and stability, making them susceptible to speed throttling and packet loss. Especially during peak hours (such as the evening rush hour in China or the afternoon hours in the Pacific Ocean), some data centers with non-optimized connections can experience significant latency increases, impacting the playback experience. Therefore, if your video platform targets users in mainland China, it's recommended to prioritize data centers with CN2 GIA, CTG, direct connections, or multi-BGP optimization.

  Of course, choosing Los Angeles also comes with some potential risks. First, the uncertainty of trans-Pacific links. While Los Angeles offers numerous direct connections to Asia, latency fluctuations are inevitable during periods of international submarine cable maintenance or network incidents. Second, video websites are vulnerable to traffic attacks, especially hotlinking, scraping, and DDoS attacks. Using standard servers without defenses can lead to temporary data center bans in the event of a high-volume attack. Therefore, it's recommended to use a CDN or a server with a DDoS protection package.

  Furthermore, video websites often face increased storage pressure. While Los Angeles data centers offer low bandwidth, storage costs are relatively high. For platforms that require long-term storage of large video files, a hybrid architecture can be considered: deploying the primary server in Los Angeles while utilizing object storage to store historical content. This approach saves costs while ensuring fast access.

  In summary, the Los Angeles data center, with its advantageous network location, abundant bandwidth resources, low costs, and optimized access to Asia, is ideally suited for video websites. Whether it's online video tutorials, short video platforms, film and television streaming sites, or cross-border streaming services, the Los Angeles node provides a stable and cost-effective foundation. However, when selecting a data center, special attention should be paid to the line type, defense capabilities, bandwidth limitations, and CDN integration options to achieve the best playback experience.

Relevant contents

Hong Kong server line comparison: CN2 GIA, BGP, and international bandwidth differences explained In high-latency scenarios, is the BBR algorithm suitable for all servers? Construction of Hong Kong VPS cache penetration protection system 2025 Cross-border E-commerce Server Configuration and Discount Guide Can Japanese servers prevent DDoS attacks? Defense measures and principle analysis What is a Riser card in the Japanese server? What are its specific functions? How to deal with the shortage of server space in the United States How to improve SEO effects by optimizing Hong Kong server configuration Is the CN2 line of the rational discussion server really much faster than the ordinary line? How to optimize the access speed of Hong Kong servers to make mainland access smoother
Go back

24/7/365 support.We work when you work

Support