Support > About independent server > A full comparison of the resolutions, bit rates and frame rates supported by the recording and broadcasting servers
A full comparison of the resolutions, bit rates and frame rates supported by the recording and broadcasting servers
Time : 2025-07-29 16:34:18
Edit : Jtti

  With the popularity of distance learning, video conferencing, webinars and online training, recording and broadcasting servers have become an indispensable technical tool for education, enterprises and media industries. As the core of the recording and broadcasting system, the recording and broadcasting server assumes the key responsibilities of video acquisition, encoding, storage and distribution. In the actual deployment process, the three indicators of resolution, bit rate and frame rate have a decisive impact on the recording and broadcasting quality, storage cost and network bandwidth occupancy.

  1. Resolution support comparison

  Resolution determines the clarity of the video image. In the recording and broadcasting scenario, the common resolutions are mainly the following:

  Resolution 480p: pixel size 720×480, video ratio 16:9, suitable for low bit rate live broadcast, mobile terminal priority

  Resolution 720p: pixel size 1280×720, video ratio 16:9, suitable for mainstream high-definition video teaching

  Resolution 1080p: pixel size 1920×1080, video ratio 16:9, suitable for high-quality live broadcast and recording

  Resolution 2K: pixel size 2560×1440, video ratio 16:9, suitable for high-definition conference or large-screen display

  Resolution 4K: pixel size 3840×2160, video ratio 16:9, suitable for professional teaching, broadcasting and television level

  Most of the mainstream recording and broadcasting servers on the market currently support recording from 480p to 1080p, among which mid-to-high-end products can support 2K or even 4K resolution. It should be noted that the higher the resolution, the greater the encoding processing capacity and storage pressure, so the image quality and cost should be weighed when choosing.

  2. Bit rate range comparison

  Bit rate is an important indicator to measure the size of video data stream, and the unit is generally kbps or Mbps. Bitrate directly affects video quality and occupied bandwidth:

  Resolution 480: recommended bitrate range p800kbps - 1.5Mbps, smooth picture quality, slightly mosaic

  Resolution 720p: recommended bitrate range 1.5Mbps - 3Mbps, clear picture quality, moderate picture quality

  Resolution 1080: recommended bitrate range p3Mbps - 6Mbps, high-definition picture quality, good detail restoration

  Resolution 2K: recommended bitrate range 6Mbps - 12Mbps, extremely clear picture quality, professional picture

  Resolution 4K: recommended bitrate range 12Mbps - 25Mbps, extremely high-definition picture quality

  Different brands of recording and broadcasting servers have slightly different bitrate settings. Some devices use constant bitrate (CBR), which is suitable for stable network scenarios; others use variable bitrate (VBR), which can dynamically and adaptively adjust the data volume according to the picture to improve the quality and stability of the video stream.

  3. Frame rate selection and comparison

  Frame rate is the number of images displayed per second in a video, measured in FPS. Common frame rates include 15FPS, 24FPS, 30FPS, 60FPS, etc.

  15FPS takes up less bandwidth, saves resources, slightly jerky images, not smooth audio-dominated teaching (such as voice)

  24FPS is a movie-level standard, visually natural, not suitable for high-speed dynamic image explanation courses

  30FPS has a high degree of fluency, and mainstream standard resources are used in a medium-general purpose lecture, conference, and course

  60FPS is extremely smooth, with clear motion and large resource usage. Sports, action demonstrations, and practical courses

  The recording and broadcasting server is usually set to 30FPS by default, which is a comfortable frame rate for most people to watch. Under the premise of sufficient bandwidth and strong processing power, 60FPS can provide a more delicate visual experience, but it is not recommended for all occasions.

  4. Differences in hardware encoding and compatibility

  The recording and broadcasting server is also limited by the encoding chip and system architecture used in terms of supported resolution and frame rate. For example:

  CPU software encoding: supports a wide range of formats but limited performance, suitable for light-load applications;

  GPU hardware acceleration (such as NVIDIA NVENC): efficient processing of high-resolution multi-channel video, but high cost;

  Professional encoding cards (such as Magewell, AJA): suitable for broadcasting-level recording, compatible with 4K and even 8K.

  Some low-end devices claim to support 4K, but the actual frame rate is only 15FPS, or only support playback but not real-time recording. Users need to pay special attention to product technical specifications when purchasing.

  The resolution, bit rate and frame rate of the recording and broadcasting server are key parameters that affect video quality and system efficiency. Understanding and correctly matching the three can achieve the best video recording and distribution experience in different scenarios. When selecting, users should combine their own scenarios, budgets, viewing terminals and network conditions to reasonably formulate recording and broadcasting configuration plans to ensure user experience and improve system performance.

  When selecting recording and broadcasting equipment, avoid blindly stacking parameters, but should take "applicability first, stability first" as the basic principle to achieve long-term and efficient operation of the recording and broadcasting system.

Relevant contents

Analysis of the root cause of the server frequently prompting that the DNS address cannot be found How to deal with DNS resolution failure after the server changes IP Which is more cost-effective, Singapore server or Hong Kong server? Sharing of typical application scenarios of Japan's large bandwidth dedicated host How to choose a server for overseas financial system deployment? Mainly consider the following points Speed comparison and performance testing method of Hong Kong cluster servers and Japanese cluster servers What are the main reasons for frequent disconnection of game high-defense servers? 2025 Cabinet PDU Brand Cost-Effectiveness Ranking: Enterprise Procurement Reference Guide What kind of server is needed for TikTok independent station deployment? What is a reasonable budget? How Japan's high-bandwidth servers improve IoT response speed
Go back

24/7/365 support.We work when you work

Support